Monthly update: continuously reducing risk
The Thrifty 30 moves sideways, the market moves all over the place
Here’s the performance table:
Here’s the performance chart:
Here’s a familiar refrain:
A neighbour commented this morning that the stock market must be interesting at the moment.
I gave my usual reply, which is, I keep my head down.
Once a month I surface to update these charts and tables, viewing them with mild curiosity and resolving to take no action because of them.
Changes in performance in one month are a poor source of feedback, if, as I believe, in the short-term the market is, effectively, random and unpredictable. That’s why I don’t try to explain why a certain company’s price has risen, and another’s has fallen. Everybody is anxious about the state of almost every economy, which, as an explanation for the hyperactive and generally depressed state of the market, is both concise and about as accurate as I can hope to be.
I could expend a lot of time and energy attaching plausible-sounding reasons to share price movements, and plausible-sounding rationales for future movements. Almost always these will be wrong, because the financial world is too complex to predict, at least with modest resources. That doesn’t mean I’m sanguine about the market. The alternative to trying to understand it is to accept it’s risky and play safe.
So in keeping my head down, I’m not holding it in my hands and praying things will turn out all right, or blithely assuming it will. I’m continuously reducing the risk in the Thrifty 30 portfolio by ejecting companies that, because of their high prices or changes in their businesses, are too speculative, and adding new companies with strong finances and good prospects at low prices. If I don’t find any, I keep the cash.
This month I ejected Solid State, the portfolio’s best performer, which is why the portfolio table looks a little shabby. Its 146% return is an anonymous portion of the cash balance.
I’m confident In the long-term thrifty companies will make investors more money than investment in the broad index.
If the Thrifty 30 fails it will be because I picked the wrong companies at the wrong valuations, and not because I should have spent longer watching and wondering about their vibrating share prices.
Better get my head down.
4 Comments
Leave a comment
Comments
- Richard Beddard on Learning from Lauren
- Mark Carter on Learning from Lauren
- Richard Beddard on Ambivalent about French correction
- Mark Carter on Ambivalent about French correction
- Ken Kahura on Towards the perfect PE
- Richard Beddard on Games Workshop in two minutes
- Ethereal on Games Workshop in two minutes
- Monevator on Throwing the net wide open
- Richard Beddard on Throwing the net wide open
- Monevator on Throwing the net wide open
- Richard Beddard on Throwing the net wide open
- Monevator on Throwing the net wide open
- The cyclically-adjusted P/E ratio (PE10 or Shiller PE) on State of the market
- Philip O'Sullivan on Churchill China in 1 minute 53 seconds
- Richard Beddard on Churchill China in 1 minute 53 seconds
- Market Musings 1/5/2012 « Philip O'Sullivan's Market Musings on Churchill China in 1 minute 53 seconds
- Philip O'Sullivan on Churchill China in 1 minute 53 seconds
- Brad on Million Dollar Traders
- Stefan | Simple Value Investing on Pensions: peril or profit?
- Richard Beddard on PV Crystalox Solar in 1 minute 56 seconds
RB on Twitter
- @pdosullivan Thanks Philip. Ditto.
- Interesting thoughts from @mcturra2000 on magic formula investing http://t.co/JEq0Ak1j my reply: http://t.co/UHRnYZKR
- Just discovered there are two Mervyn Kings. This one hits the bullseye https://t.co/JmPZPIIp This one moves the target https://t.co/JmPZPIIp
- @smarkus Thanks
- Thinking of tackling Next L:NXT next. It scares me witless. @spbaines and @GeoffGannon wld have me rely on earning power. Soooo hard...
Latest posts
- French Connection in 2 minutes 9 seconds
- Restoration man
- Redefining French Connection
- Leases key to retailer’s financial position
- Ambivalent about French correction
- Three earnings yields
- Premier Foods in 2 minutes 11 seconds
- Throwing the net wide open
- Holders Technology in 2 minutes 8 seconds
- Churchill China in 1 minute 53 seconds
Sections
Companies
Archives
Blogroll
- Alphaville
- Barel Karsan
- Eurosharelab
- Expecting Value
- Gannon on Investing
- Mark Carter
- Monevator
- Musings on Markets
- My Investing Notebook
- Neonomic
- Oddball Stocks
- Peston's Picks
- Philip O'Sullivan
- Seth's Posterous
- The Value Perspective
- Turnkey Analyst
- UK Value Investor
- Value Stock Inquisition
- Valuhunteruk.com
- Wexboy



Great commentary Richard.
That is all.
Thanks Monevator,
That was going to be all, but I followed a link to a post to Geoff Gannon’s blog ( http://www.gannononinvesting.com/blog/the-4-questions-to-ask-before-buying-a-stock.html ) from your round-up of the week’s best posts: http://monevator.com/2011/10/08/weekend-reading-genius-speech/ .
Geoff says there are only four questions you need to ask before buying a share:
Is it safe?
Is it a great business?
Am I getting a great price?
Can I hold this stock for as long as it takes?
I pick very different shares to Geoff, but almost always agree with the way he thinks. Essentially I ask the first three, all the time. And that’s it.
The hardest to answer is the second: is it a great business? It involves a lot of kicking the tyres, industry expertise, and business nous. I’m not very good at it, but I’m trying to get better. It’s really what separates the Buffetologists from the Grahamites. Buffetologists claim to be able to work out a company’s competitive advantage and know when it’s undervalued by the market. Grahamites aren’t so confident. So we have to put safety first.
That’s it
Richard, I’m with you on this one. Graham’s approach is so appealing because it requires little insight and is statistically likely to get you ahead of the indices. That’s why, if people were to ask me who I think is the single-most important investor thinker, and/or could most likely be applied by ordinary people, then I would definitely say Graham.
I would to. So has Buffett – many times!