Nov 21, 2011
Richard Beddard

Oh French Connection

On loosing faith

Thursday’s trading update upended French Connection’s recovery credentials. The problem is its shops and department store concessions in the UK and Europe. There were 128 of them in January, and they’re not profitable, although that much we already knew.

The company provides a convenient breakdown of revenues and operating profits in the main body of its annual report:

2011 FCCN divisional analysis

Of all its divisions, retail in UK and Europe (rather ominously consisting of stores in Ireland and concessions in Portugal and Spain) has the highest gross profit margins, but deduct costs and it made an operating loss in the year ending January 2011.

By contrast, at the wholesale divisions supplying franchises, retailers and online shopping sites like ASOS, gross margins are lower because the retailers takes their cut, but at least French Connection makes a profit, because its operating costs, like staff and rent, are much lower.

Having closed all of its stores in Japan, and many of its stores in the US, French Connection is successfully growing at home and abroad through these wholesale channels which include 199 branded licensed or franchised outlets in Australia (80), India (25), China (20), the Middle East (13).

Judging by the 9.5% collapse in third quarter like for like sales at its own stores closer to home, things are getting worse. Where the company sees ‘significant opportunity for improvement’, the market, the shares fell sharply on Thursday, probably sees a money pit that could swallow the profit from the wholesale divisions.

Barring the perpetual effort to design attractive clothes and market them as cost effectively as possible, recovery in the High Street depends on an improvement in consumer confidence, which in turn depends on the state of the overall economy, and on refining French Connection’s portfolio of stores, a euphemism (of mine) for closing down unprofitable ones.

But French Connection is not closing stores. Most are on long-term leases with upward-only rent reviews, which explains the high costs.

About six leases come up for renewal every year and last year only one store was closed in the UK and Ireland, which leaves French Connection relying on the strength of its balance sheet and the profits from the wholesale divisions to bankroll its retail operations until the economy improves or it somehow ups its game.

Ignoring operating leases, which company accounting largely does, French Connection has a strong balance sheet; £31m in net cash at the half year in July and nearly 60% of assets funded by shareholders’ equity. If we add in the amount owed to landlords, though, that ratio drops to 24%.

It may sound like I’ve lost faith in French Connection. I haven’t really. With the price down at 60p, the story is much the same as it was when I added the company to the Thrifty 30 at 43p a share in April last year. Then I took the opportunity to add an iconic brand run by an experienced chief executive with a 40% stake in the company on the cheap, thinking it might take years to recover.

But events unfolded more quickly. The company surprised the market in February this year by reporting a strong recovery in its full year results and the shares rose to a high of 134p. Had I been on-the ball then, I may have ‘sold’ with the price approaching 2 times book value, but I didn’t review the company when it published its annual report as I should have done because I was concentrating on finding new companies for the portfolio.

In other words I let my value discipline drop, and, as always happens on these occasions, I’ve lost a little faith in myself.

5 Comments

  • [...] looking rather cheap on a forward and historic earnings basis. As an aside, it's also a share that Richard Beddard holds in his Thrifty 30 portfolio; the price decline being bad news for him but throwing it into my face for [...]

  • In retail if the business model breaks down or loses touch, its very hard to recover from that. Before inditex and H&M rose to prominence, Benetton, Sisley, FCUK, and some other so so business used to occupy the big low and mid price range apparel market. No they are all in decline. Like Dixons, Game plc vs Amazon. The only reason for your interest in the stock is because is cheap. So is real estate in mogadishu. Get out.

    • Orestis, I too am bearish on FCCN. Their profit margins are awefully thin.

      BUT. BUT. I know of a highly successful private investor who thinks it is compelling value at these levels. They have a significant cash buffer, and there is a growth story in their overseas markets.

  • I just noticed, the shares currently trade at 44.5-p, not much above your purchase price, I’m afraid.

    When did it close its stores? Can we expect that to have a positive impact on reported profits?

    • Hi Blippy, if you’re talking about Japan/the US etc. the closures are history, and any way, I use continuing operations in most of my calculations. The problem is the existing UK retail store operation is not profitable and, as far as I understand it, the company isn’t closing stores, at least not significant numbers of them, because they are on long leases.

      I imagine the same calculations are going on at French Connection as many UK retailers now: which is more costly; running unprofitable stores, or shedding leases? That of course depends on how easily FCCN can shed leases (not very) and whether management believes it can turn its stores around.

      Stephen Marks founded the company in 1969 and has rescued it at least once. He also owns a big stake in the company, so basically I’m backing management to get through this. So far, he’s kept the company debt free and taken some tough decisions.

Leave a comment

RB on Twitter

Archives