Patience may bring profit at printing.com
slowly, slowly
So far, the Thrifty 30 portfolio’s investment in high street printing franchise, printing.com (PDC), hasn’t disappointed or delighted.
Printing.com differs from other franchises like Kall-Kwik and Prontaprint because production is handled at a central hub in Manchester and most of its outlets are ‘bolt-ons’, run by independent printers that offer in-house printing too.
It provides higher quality (full colour), at low prices (though a comparison chart on Printing.com’s site is over two years old now), and prints the usual range of business cards, stationary and promotional leaflets, mainly for small businesses. Most of its revenue comes from wholesaling printing services to its franchisees, as opposed to licences.
Last year printing.com seemed to be weathering a severe recession in the printing industry, a fact I didn’t think was fully appreciated by investors. I made the company one of the inaugural members of the Thrifty 30 in September.
Then the share price was 33.5p, today it’s 37.5p and the portfolio’s received an interim dividend of 1.05p a share or nearly £31 on its £1,000 investment. The final dividend of 2.1p is due in July.
Although its price rose as high as 75p in 2005 and, very briefly it fell below 25p during the credit crunch, investors who bought the flotation in 2004 are no better off now, except for dividend payments.
Then the company was unproven. It had had earned a year of profit and had yet to pay a dividend. Now it’s earned seven years of profit and the shares yield 9%.
But profit growth stalled in 2007, profits have fallen modestly since, and the dividend looks too costly for the company to maintain if profits don’t increase. Net profit for the year to the end of March was £1.3m, and printing.com paid and promised £1.4m in dividends. Obviously it can’t do that forever. If profits don’t go up, the dividend will have to come down.
Despite the uncertainty though, I’m
going to stick with printing.com.
Founder and chief executive Tony Rafferty owns nearly 20.5%, of the shares and chairman George Hardie about 3.75%, which makes them committed long-term shareholders who are likely to run the business prudently. Although 55% of the shares are not in public hands, the other six major shareholders look like independent financial institutions.
It’s a profitable company with very little debt and while its failure to grow will have disappointed investors and the possibility of a dividend cut may disappoint again, at just ten times average earnings over the last six years, the shares are good value.
Although profit growth seemed to come to a halt before the recession, the company explained in its 2007 annual report that it had invested in doubling the capacity of its Manchester hub, and in developing international master licenses that would allow printers in New Zealand, Australia, France and the USA to implement its business model. The trouble is that investment, which dented profits in 2007, didn’t pay off between 2008 and 2010 as recession meant reduced interest in new franchises and reduced business in existing ones.
While I fear the Chancellor’s austerity budget may kill off the weak economic recovery we’re experiencing now, I reckon printing.com will reward us when it eventually happens.
This is a portfolio that expects its investments to deliver the goods over 3-5 years, not months, so now is not the time to be impatient with what appears to be a perfectly good company.
-
Thrifty 30 updates
The current Thrifty 30 portfolio
Airline and haulage group Dart is not making any promises in an uncertain economic environment but for a recession and ash-hit year its final results look (at first glance) quite reassuring.
2 Comments
Leave a comment
Comments
- Richard Beddard on Learning from Lauren
- Mark Carter on Learning from Lauren
- Richard Beddard on Ambivalent about French correction
- Mark Carter on Ambivalent about French correction
- Ken Kahura on Towards the perfect PE
- Richard Beddard on Games Workshop in two minutes
- Ethereal on Games Workshop in two minutes
- Monevator on Throwing the net wide open
- Richard Beddard on Throwing the net wide open
- Monevator on Throwing the net wide open
- Richard Beddard on Throwing the net wide open
- Monevator on Throwing the net wide open
- The cyclically-adjusted P/E ratio (PE10 or Shiller PE) on State of the market
- Philip O'Sullivan on Churchill China in 1 minute 53 seconds
- Richard Beddard on Churchill China in 1 minute 53 seconds
- Market Musings 1/5/2012 « Philip O'Sullivan's Market Musings on Churchill China in 1 minute 53 seconds
- Philip O'Sullivan on Churchill China in 1 minute 53 seconds
- Brad on Million Dollar Traders
- Stefan | Simple Value Investing on Pensions: peril or profit?
- Richard Beddard on PV Crystalox Solar in 1 minute 56 seconds
RB on Twitter
- @pdosullivan Thanks Philip. Ditto.
- Interesting thoughts from @mcturra2000 on magic formula investing http://t.co/JEq0Ak1j my reply: http://t.co/UHRnYZKR
- Just discovered there are two Mervyn Kings. This one hits the bullseye https://t.co/JmPZPIIp This one moves the target https://t.co/JmPZPIIp
- @smarkus Thanks
- Thinking of tackling Next L:NXT next. It scares me witless. @spbaines and @GeoffGannon wld have me rely on earning power. Soooo hard...
Latest posts
- French Connection in 2 minutes 9 seconds
- Restoration man
- Redefining French Connection
- Leases key to retailer’s financial position
- Ambivalent about French correction
- Three earnings yields
- Premier Foods in 2 minutes 11 seconds
- Throwing the net wide open
- Holders Technology in 2 minutes 8 seconds
- Churchill China in 1 minute 53 seconds
Sections
Companies
Archives
Blogroll
- Alphaville
- Barel Karsan
- Eurosharelab
- Expecting Value
- Gannon on Investing
- Mark Carter
- Monevator
- Musings on Markets
- My Investing Notebook
- Neonomic
- Oddball Stocks
- Peston's Picks
- Philip O'Sullivan
- Seth's Posterous
- The Value Perspective
- Turnkey Analyst
- UK Value Investor
- Value Stock Inquisition
- Valuhunteruk.com
- Wexboy



PDC just announced an acquisition.
It seems to me that it’s a great acquisition. They are going to pay about 2 million Euros for MFG. MFG has about 6.7 million in sales and barely produced a miniscule profit last year.
However, they outsource production of goods and pay about 4 million for this. They plan to move half the production to PDC’s Manchester factory, which is underutilized anyways.
So, PDC’s cost of production is at most 35% of sales. MFG’s production is 60% of sales. By moving half the production they will save more than 800 thousand a year (assuming no sales growth/decline). Assuming MFG would breakeven otherwise, that means more than 800 thousand in incremental profits, all for the price of only 2 million (2.5 p/e). Seems like a no brainer.
What do you think?
Haven’t given it any thought yet Eric, but I’d be surprised if Rafferty made a wasteful acquisition. I like your reasoning and I might scrutinise it more carefully when I come to review PDC. All the best, Richard.