Transporting Autologic to a more profitable future
The cockroach survives
Like French Connection and Johnson Service, Autologic (ALG) is a Naked PE alumnus. In February 2007, May 2007, August 2007, November 2007, and February 2008, it was one of very cheapest stocks on the stock market according to Dr Keith Anderson’s extreme PE statistic.
I didn’t consider it for the Thrifty 30 then because it didn’t look financially strong enough. A few years on though, the company has survived round one of the credit crunch, possibly but not certainly the only round, and though you might not believe it from the share price, it’s looking stronger.
Autologic prepares, adapts, stores, transports and refurbishes vehicles for manufacturers, mostly, through centres in the UK, Belgium, the Netherlands, and the Czech Republic.
During the recession, the motor industry went into a crisis I’ve documented when profiling engineering companies Castings and Ricardo, both in the Thrifty 30 portfolio. But Autologic’s problems go back much earlier. All my charts, price, profitability, profit, and financial strength show a company in inexorable decline for most of the last decade.
Although it may have been operating profitably (light green line) for most of the last decade, it wasn’t if you count the exceptional items (light blue line) ignored in the adjusted figure (dark blue line). I haven’t been through a decade of annual reports to find out why, they go back to 2003 on Autologic’s site, but I have glanced through some of the key developments. Humiliating exits from businesses in Spain and France in 2007, the French subsidiary went bust, the cancellation of a major contract with Ford, and the prolonged and ongoing reductions in the number of drivers and transporters the company employs may also explain
the exceptional costs and how the company is worth no more in accounting terms than it was ten years ago. The decline in financial strength (dark green line) would have been worse had investors not chipped in £12.1m when the company sold new shares in 2006.
But new management seems to have stabilised Autologic, at a smaller scale. 2009’s results indicate the company is growing stronger. It was more profitable in cash and accounting terms, and less indebted, than in 2009. It’s F_Score is seven out of nine, eight out of nine if you ignore a small amount of shares issued to reward executives. Since the company costs just over one times average (adjusted) earnings over the last ten years, statistically speaking Autologic is the perfect Thrifty 30 company, as long as the new managers are what they seem, more prudent and conservative than previous ones.
Chief Executive, Avril Palmer-Baunack and finance director Andrew Somerville joined the company in November 2007 from Universal Salvage, a company they turned around and sold to Copart. They’re joined on the board by Mark Butcher, a non-executive director who is UK investment manager of activist value investor Guinness Peat. Guinness Peat is the largest shareholder in the company, owning 26.2% of the shares, and has been since the placing in 2006. It wouldn’t surprise me if Guinness Peat were instrumental in bringing Palmer-Baunack and Somerville to Autologic.
In Guinness Peat the portfolio might have found a friendly bedfellow. It:
This is value investing-speak for buying companies with good prospects at less than the investment company’s assessment of their value. Good companies at cheap prices, in other words, the raison d’être of the Thrifty 30. As well as restructuring public companies, GPG has been known to take them private, a situation I wouldn’t welcome (unless they paid a lot). Six other institutional investors own 51% of the shares, though, and GPG is promising to return capital to its shareholders, so there is little imminent danger.
So far, Autologic hasn’t justified GPG’s faith, which must, in part at least, be because recession intervened as the company restructured. The coming year is not without its challenges as well. In February the government’s scrappage scheme ended and demand for cars is expected to soften by about 9%. Meanwhile, manufacturers operating with reduced inventories are demanding more timely delivery of their vehicles and some competitors, Autologic supposes, are charging unsustainably low prices.
Nevertheless this is the kind of company I imagined putting into the Thrifty 30. It’s a despised company in a despised sector but it’s surviving. All we need is some warm summers and this cockroach will come back!
GPG and the Naked PE fell victim to the value investors’ curse, buying too early, let’s hope I’m not making the same mistake.
I’ve added Autologic to the Thrifty 30 portfolio at 28p per share, the actual price quoted by a broker.
Vroom
-
Thrifty 30 updates
The current Thrifty 30 portfolio
Printing.com publishes its final results. Management is: “Optimistic of prospects irrespective of conditions improving.”
4 Comments
Leave a comment
Comments
- Richard Beddard on Learning from Lauren
- Mark Carter on Learning from Lauren
- Richard Beddard on Ambivalent about French correction
- Mark Carter on Ambivalent about French correction
- Ken Kahura on Towards the perfect PE
- Richard Beddard on Games Workshop in two minutes
- Ethereal on Games Workshop in two minutes
- Monevator on Throwing the net wide open
- Richard Beddard on Throwing the net wide open
- Monevator on Throwing the net wide open
- Richard Beddard on Throwing the net wide open
- Monevator on Throwing the net wide open
- The cyclically-adjusted P/E ratio (PE10 or Shiller PE) on State of the market
- Philip O'Sullivan on Churchill China in 1 minute 53 seconds
- Richard Beddard on Churchill China in 1 minute 53 seconds
- Market Musings 1/5/2012 « Philip O'Sullivan's Market Musings on Churchill China in 1 minute 53 seconds
- Philip O'Sullivan on Churchill China in 1 minute 53 seconds
- Brad on Million Dollar Traders
- Stefan | Simple Value Investing on Pensions: peril or profit?
- Richard Beddard on PV Crystalox Solar in 1 minute 56 seconds
RB on Twitter
- @pdosullivan Thanks Philip. Ditto.
- Interesting thoughts from @mcturra2000 on magic formula investing http://t.co/JEq0Ak1j my reply: http://t.co/UHRnYZKR
- Just discovered there are two Mervyn Kings. This one hits the bullseye https://t.co/JmPZPIIp This one moves the target https://t.co/JmPZPIIp
- @smarkus Thanks
- Thinking of tackling Next L:NXT next. It scares me witless. @spbaines and @GeoffGannon wld have me rely on earning power. Soooo hard...
Latest posts
- French Connection in 2 minutes 9 seconds
- Restoration man
- Redefining French Connection
- Leases key to retailer’s financial position
- Ambivalent about French correction
- Three earnings yields
- Premier Foods in 2 minutes 11 seconds
- Throwing the net wide open
- Holders Technology in 2 minutes 8 seconds
- Churchill China in 1 minute 53 seconds
Sections
Companies
Archives
Blogroll
- Alphaville
- Barel Karsan
- Eurosharelab
- Expecting Value
- Gannon on Investing
- Mark Carter
- Monevator
- Musings on Markets
- My Investing Notebook
- Neonomic
- Oddball Stocks
- Peston's Picks
- Philip O'Sullivan
- Seth's Posterous
- The Value Perspective
- Turnkey Analyst
- UK Value Investor
- Value Stock Inquisition
- Valuhunteruk.com
- Wexboy



I think if ALG were about 50% cheaper I might be interested (I’m a cheap-skate I know). However, I would be wary since the numbers looked quite good in 2005/6 (PB 0.68 and PTB 1.1 and possibly lower, liquidity and gearing were reasonable) only for the managers to sell of huge chunks of the company, obliterating book value in the process. That may or may not have been the right thing to do but as a shareholder it would still hurt.
I suppose that’s one of the key risks in these kinds of businesses… that they keel over or downsize so much there’s nothing left to profit from.
Let’s hope you have better luck than I would have had had I bought the company back then.
It’s interesting isn’t it? I wouldn’t have bought in 2006 because its fundamentals were deteriorating. Autologic’s F_Score was only 4 in 2006. The F_Score’s a long way from infallible but I’ve been burned enough times by companies that were dirt cheap and got cheaper or even went bust to try and avoid that fate where I can, which means extreme patience – waiting for cheap companies to start to turn around. I’m going to labour that point in Monday’s blog, actually!
It’s all about averages isn’t it. Companies that are cheap (by your measures and mine) as a group beat the market in the long-run. I think I can improve on that basic value premium by waiting for the first statistical glimmer of recovery. By waiting, in this instance I think I’ve increased the chances of Autologic being a good investment even if it means I’ve paid more in terms of book value.
Of course I could easily be wrong! I hope to be right just over half the time so I’m more comfortable that the whole portfolio will beat the market than any one company will
As always UKVI, thanks for your thoughtful comments.
[...] Autologic shares under the spotlight – iii blog [...]
[...] invested 75% in shares, and 25% in cash or bonds. However it took until June, and the addition of Autologic, to reach 75%. In the meantime, the excess cash earned nothing (I don’t add interest to the cash [...]