Victoria weathers disaster and depression
The value is tangible, not so sure about earning power
Victoria makes and distributes carpets under the Victoria Carpets brand and others. Its biggest market is Australasia, which may have saved it from the worst of the recession, followed by the UK. It also sells carpets through an associate company in Canada, and although it is closing its Irish operation due to a catastrophic decline in demand there, it will continue to sell carpets through agents who are former employees.
Rather ghoulishly, the floods that turned Queensland into a disaster zone last December, and the earthquake that devastated Christchurch in February are likely to be good for business once rebuilding commences and insurance claims are settled, although the local economies are currently depressed, as is the UK generally. The rising cost of wool and synthetic (oil-based) fibre has combined with our reluctance to buy carpets to scupper profit margins.
[Data Source, 2011 annual report, here’s the spreadsheet]
Victoria’s F_Score of seven out of nine indicates it’s getting stronger, though, and a trading update last month confirmed the trend has continued beyond the end of the year, particularly in the UK, where it has successfully increased prices and entered a new market supplying the UK’s leading insurance replacement specialist.
The two F_Score fails are marginal. Its current ratio, or ability to meet short-term obligations (current liabilities) out of currents assets has deteriorated fractionally and so has its gross profit margin, but in round numbers they’re stable.
Otherwise the company is less indebted and more profitable than it was last year.
In absolute terms, though, Victoria is still finding business conditions tough. Return on Assets is a pitiful 2% so the shares are going to have to be very cheap or I’m going to have to be confident profitability will improve, probably both, to add the company to the Thrifty 30 portfolio.
It certainly looks cheap. At 265p the market values Victoria at just under £18.5m, half its tangible book value, mostly property, machinery and stock valued at £39.5m in the accounts last April.
Victoria expects the UK market to remain subdued for at least two more years, and it’s trying to increase market share in all territories and reduce its dependence on independent retailers by selling a wider variety of high quality but good value carpets (and carpet tiles) to commercial customers and by cultivating a higher profile with its new range in John Lewis department stores.
The value of its factories and stock is tangible enough, but the profits the company might earn from it need a little more scrutiny. There’s no doubt Victoria is a resilient company, I’m just not sure its profitable enough.
An investigation into Victoria’s earnings over the past decade should help.
4 Comments
Leave a comment
Comments
- Richard Beddard on Learning from Lauren
- Mark Carter on Learning from Lauren
- Richard Beddard on Ambivalent about French correction
- Mark Carter on Ambivalent about French correction
- Ken Kahura on Towards the perfect PE
- Richard Beddard on Games Workshop in two minutes
- Ethereal on Games Workshop in two minutes
- Monevator on Throwing the net wide open
- Richard Beddard on Throwing the net wide open
- Monevator on Throwing the net wide open
- Richard Beddard on Throwing the net wide open
- Monevator on Throwing the net wide open
- The cyclically-adjusted P/E ratio (PE10 or Shiller PE) on State of the market
- Philip O'Sullivan on Churchill China in 1 minute 53 seconds
- Richard Beddard on Churchill China in 1 minute 53 seconds
- Market Musings 1/5/2012 « Philip O'Sullivan's Market Musings on Churchill China in 1 minute 53 seconds
- Philip O'Sullivan on Churchill China in 1 minute 53 seconds
- Brad on Million Dollar Traders
- Stefan | Simple Value Investing on Pensions: peril or profit?
- Richard Beddard on PV Crystalox Solar in 1 minute 56 seconds
RB on Twitter
- @pdosullivan Thanks Philip. Ditto.
- Interesting thoughts from @mcturra2000 on magic formula investing http://t.co/JEq0Ak1j my reply: http://t.co/UHRnYZKR
- Just discovered there are two Mervyn Kings. This one hits the bullseye https://t.co/JmPZPIIp This one moves the target https://t.co/JmPZPIIp
- @smarkus Thanks
- Thinking of tackling Next L:NXT next. It scares me witless. @spbaines and @GeoffGannon wld have me rely on earning power. Soooo hard...
Latest posts
- French Connection in 2 minutes 9 seconds
- Restoration man
- Redefining French Connection
- Leases key to retailer’s financial position
- Ambivalent about French correction
- Three earnings yields
- Premier Foods in 2 minutes 11 seconds
- Throwing the net wide open
- Holders Technology in 2 minutes 8 seconds
- Churchill China in 1 minute 53 seconds
Sections
Companies
Archives
Blogroll
- Alphaville
- Barel Karsan
- Eurosharelab
- Expecting Value
- Gannon on Investing
- Mark Carter
- Monevator
- Musings on Markets
- My Investing Notebook
- Neonomic
- Oddball Stocks
- Peston's Picks
- Philip O'Sullivan
- Seth's Posterous
- The Value Perspective
- Turnkey Analyst
- UK Value Investor
- Value Stock Inquisition
- Valuhunteruk.com
- Wexboy



I used to own shares in this company. I had them for a couple of years and made about 18%, which wasn’t too bad. At 250p I think they’re at a ‘fair’ price, so not attractive enough for me to buy, but let’s see what you unearth. They’re a company I always had a soft spot; just an unpretentious firm with a bomb-proof balance sheet making nice carpets.
Of course they don’t fit my ‘above average company’ criteria now, but I’m sure they’d find a welcome home in somebody’s portfolio.
Hi John, nice to see we’re crossing paths again
A quick look at profitability over the past ten years isn’t overly inspiring, but you never know, they might find a place in the Thrifty 30. As you say, unpretentious.
Nice buisness, interesting history of selling a fair way below book ratio, me thinks the earnings are the culprit somewhere.
I’m afraid so Robert.